>0 say @ 2025/07/27 16:18
For me, it's /usr/bin/mail -> /usr/bin/s-nail
>1 ant @ 2025/07/29 08:52
>>OP With all due fear of the wrath of Shell-God, I use Sylpheed -- a GTK2-based e-mail and Usenet client. /Sylpheed Saved My Life/: http://web.archive.org/web/20061107135628/http://www.zedshaw.com/tips/sylpheed.html Not many programs have recevied such praise. One other instance is a hillarious 6-player gamed called Zatacka, of whcih the author of a review said: "Zatacka changed my life."
>2 say @ 2025/07/29 21:02
>>OP Oh cool, I like that guy Zed! I learned python from his guide originally.
>3 say @ 2025/07/29 21:05
I have to say!!!! Every time I used one of these ssh boards, like this one, or ssh lowlife@45.79.250.220 or telnet bbs.archaicbinary.net I think, "wow what a nice experience". It's too bad it's not more common. I like it even better than usenet etc. But I don't use anything like this normally!
>4 ant @ 2025/07/29 21:55
>>3 Well, there still are /tons/ of BBSes out there, many of them integrated with FidoNet and/or Usenet. Nova BBS (novabbs.org, novabbs.com) carried many Usenet groups, but is now down. Do try telnet magnumbbs.net -- they have a selection of Usenet groups. Yes, telnet BBS experience is somethig else.
>5 rdlmda @ 2025/07/31 17:53
>>OP I have been uning gmail's web interface for two decades now. I have also used Thunderbird briefly, but abandoned it for a few reasons, it having corrupted years of my work's mailbox not the smallest of those reasons. At work, I use either Sogo or Roundcube I had never ever used a shell mail client until recently joining tilde.club, having tried mail, mutt and alpine, I'm much more ibclined to the latter. The learning curve and different paradigm is a bit challenging, but fun.
>6 rdlmda @ 2025/07/31 19:57
>>3 All this BBS talk made me start a thread about BBS'es!